AOI Capabilities Study with 03015 Components


Reading time ( words)

Abstract

Automated optical inspection (AOI) is advantageous in that it enables defects to be detected early in the manufacturing process, reducing the cost of repair as the AOI systems identify the specific components that are failing removing the need for any additional test troubleshooting. Because of this, more electronic contract manufacturing services (EMS) companies are implementing AOI into their SMT lines to minimize repair costs and maintain good process and product quality, especially for new component types. This project focuses on the testing of component package 03015 which is challenging for AOI.

Highly-automated and effective test methods are becoming a more and more important topic in our industry today. Advances in modern manufacturing technologies have been making factories smarter, safer, and also more environmentally sustainable. Finding and implementing smart machines which provide real time information is critical to success. Currently, we have been successful in using 2D/3D AOI for production; however not for the upcoming 03015 components. Therefore, we are working with AOI vendors to ensure successful testing of this component type, with a special emphasis on optimizing algorithm threshold settings to detect defects.

We have been working with five AOI vendors with five test vehicles (PCBAs). Each PCBA board has 246 components with three different pitch sizes (100 µm, 150 µm, 200 µm). The results of Attribute GR&R, Defect Escapes, and False Call PPM (parts per million) will be presented.

Based on the data which we received up to now, every set of data (five sets—still waiting for results of AOI System 3) is from the algorithms of 2D AOI, although some machines have the 3D AOI capability. These machines have shown different levels of performance. AOI System 5’s results have an excellent acceptable level for Attribute GR&R; both AOI System 5 and AOI System 6 have only several percentage points of a Defect Escape rate. However, this study is just in its infancy; more improvement and testing will be performed. We will continue to provide new test results from all suppliers.

Introduction

The printed circuit board assembly (PCBA) industry has long embraced the smaller, lighter, faster mantra for electronic devices, especially in recent years. With the increasing use of smaller components, more consideration is required to study and implement changes; not only for SMT processes, but also for testing. There have been some studies conducted for SPI (solder paste inspection) with 03015 components, however, there are very few recommended practices for AOI.

The 03015 [0.3 mm x 0.15 mm] device is a microchip component. For reference, please note that a human hair is approximately 0.1mm. To ensure a successful implementation of the 03015 components, besides for these three critical areas—placement equipment, assembly materials, and process control—the capabilities of machines used to test these component types is another critical consideration. Now, 3D SPI is more commonly used in the SMT process, and 3D AOI is quickly catching up.

During the initial stage of our study, we first tested these five boards with 03015 components on our 2D AOI machine in our Milpitas manufacturing site. Next, we provided the boards to the R&D labs of five AOI vendors who all have 3D AOI machines. Working with various R&D engineers, it was obvious this was a challenging task for their current AOI systems, especially for 3D AOI systems due to component reflection.

Our test data and results showed that the 2D AOI machines have different capabilities in detecting defects for 03015, such as misalignment, tombstoning, and shorts. While the defect escape percentage decreased, false call PPM increased, therefore, optimized programming should be based on test data analysis.

Experiments

In total, we asked five AOI vendors (R&D engineers) to work on this project. We received four sets of test data—AOI System 3 data is to be provided later. The test procedure is the same for all machines with five boards.

Test Vehicle

Flex-Figure 1-Jun2017.jpg

Figure 1: Company Miniaturized Test Vehicle

Five boards with 03015 components were tested on the AOI machines. Figure 1 is our test vehicle, which has three areas for different pitch sizes. The pitch areas are indicated as different color arrows: red color (A – 100 µm), yellow color (B – 150 µm), and blue color (C – 200 µm).

The 03015 component was a production resistor: 292 µm, 143 µm, and 100 µm corresponding to its length, width, and height, respectively, as shown in Figure 2, where area A is without fab mask. There are a total of 87, 81, and 78 components in areas A, B, and C, respectively. The pad size (length, width) is 150 µm by 150 µm on the PCB fab. Figure 3 shows pictures for area A (right column), area B (center column), and area C (left column); after print (top row), after placement (center row), and after reflow (bottom row). There are different colors for optical pictures due to 03015 component reflection, which increased AOI testing difficulty.

Flex-Figure 2-Jun2017.jpg

Figure 2: Three areas of 03015 components.

Flex-Figure 3-Jun2017.jpg

Figure 3: Optical picture: after print (top), after placement (center), and after reflow (bottom).

To read the full version of this article, which appeared in the June 2017 issue of SMT Magazine, click here.

Share




Suggested Items

Passing the Test With SMTA’s Rob Boguski

09/14/2022 | Andy Shaughnessy, I-Connect007
I recently spoke with Rob Boguski, president of Fremont, California-based Datest and an SMTA vice president and board member. Rob explained why today’s test customers are asking for more information than the traditional pass/fail, offers a preview of SMTA International, and gives an update on SMTA’s planning strategy for the next five years.

Four Silver Linings in the Stormy Clouds of Pandemic, Supply Chain, and Inflation

09/14/2022 | Dr. Ronald C. Lasky, Indium Corp.
It may be difficult to see any bright spots in the current and recent economic situation. We have all experienced the devastation of the pandemic, supply chain issues, and most recently, inflation. However, as a senior technologist for an international materials supplier (Indium Corporation) and a professor of engineering at an Ivy League research university (Dartmouth College), I offer these four silver linings for those of us in the electronics industry.

Solder Paste Printing and Optimizations for Interconnecting Back Contact Cells

07/26/2022 | Narahari S Pujari and Krithika PM, MacDermid Alpha Electronics Solutions
The interdigitated back contact (IBC) is one of the methods to achieve rear contact solar cell interconnection. The contact and interconnection via rear side theoretically achieve higher efficiency by moving all the front contact grids to the rear side of the device. This results in all interconnection structures being located behind the cells, which brings two main advantages. First, there is no frontside shading of the cell by the interconnection ribbons, thus eliminating the need for trading off series resistance, losses for shading losses when using larger interconnection ribbons. Second, a more homogeneous looking frontside of the solar module enhances the aesthetics.



Copyright © 2022 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.