-
-
News
News Highlights
- Books
Featured Books
- smt007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueIPC APEX EXPO 2024 Pre-show
This month’s issue devotes its pages to a comprehensive preview of the IPC APEX EXPO 2024 event. Whether your role is technical or business, if you're new-to-the-industry or seasoned veteran, you'll find value throughout this program.
Boost Your Sales
Every part of your business can be evaluated as a process, including your sales funnel. Optimizing your selling process requires a coordinated effort between marketing and sales. In this issue, industry experts in marketing and sales offer their best advice on how to boost your sales efforts.
The Cost of Rework
In this issue, we investigate rework's current state of the art. What are the root causes and how are they resolved? What is the financial impact of rework, and is it possible to eliminate it entirely without sacrificing your yields?
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Events
||| MENU - smt007 Magazine
IPC Releases IMS/PCB Book-to-Bill Ratio and IMS/PCB Business Report for October 2004
December 2, 2004 |Estimated reading time: 2 minutes
Bannockburn, Ill. — IPC — Association Connecting Electronics Industries has announced the findings from its monthly PCB Statistical Program for October 2004.
IMS/PCB Book-to-Bill RatioThe North American PCB Industry Book-to-Bill Ratio for October 2004 continued positive at 1.05. This ratio is based on monthly data collected from both rigid PCB and flexible circuit producers that participate in IPC's monthly PCB Statistical Program. Separately, the book-to-bill ratios in October 2004 were 0.94 for rigid PCBs and 1.48 for flexible circuits.
The ratio is calculated by dividing the value of orders booked over the past three months by the value of sales billed during the same period from the companies in IPC's survey sample. A ratio of more than 1.00 suggests that current demand is ahead of supply, which indicates probable near-term growth.
Total Industry GrowthFor rigid PCBs and flexible circuits combined, industry sales billed (shipments) in October 2004 increased 15.3% from October 2003, and orders booked increased 2.7% from October 2003. Compared to 2003, shipments of PCBs are up 31.5% year-to-date, while bookings of PCBs are up 31.4% year-to-date. Combined industry shipments for October 2004 are down 15.5% over the previous month, and bookings are down 16.8% over the previous month.
Both rigid and flex shipments are rebounding from the recession and are showing strong growth, but flex is growing at a faster rate than rigid.
Rigid PCB GrowthRigid PCB shipments are up 3.3% and bookings are down 20.0% in October 2004 from October 2003. Year-to-date, rigid PCB shipments have increased 21.2% and bookings have increased 12.6%, compared to the same period in 2003. Rigid PCB shipments from the survey sample decreased 18.7% from the previous month and rigid bookings decreased 16.7% from the previous month.
Flexible Circuit GrowthFlexible circuit shipments are up 48.6% and bookings are up 81.5% in October 2004 from October 2003. Year-to-date, flexible circuit shipments have grown 74.4% and bookings have grown 103.1%, compared to the same period in 2003. Compared to the previous month, flexible circuit shipments from the survey sample decreased 1.9% and flex bookings decreased 17.2%.
Interpreting the DataFlexible circuit sales, which include some value-added services in addition to the bare flex circuits, represent about 17% of total PCB sales in IPC's survey sample, which IPC considers to be representative of the industry. It is difficult for most flexible circuit manufacturers to break out value-added services, such as assembly, from their circuit sales. Therefore, the amount of value-added services included in this industry segment's sales is not known.
Year-on-year and year-to-date growth rates provide the most meaningful view of industry growth. Month-to-month comparisons should be made with caution as they may reflect cyclical effects. Because bookings tend to be more volatile than shipments, changes in the book-to-bill ratios from month to month may not be significant unless a trend of three consecutive months or more is apparent.