How to Select an Automatic Pick-and-Place Machine


Reading time ( words)

This is the third in a series of articles designed to help buyers analyze and select SMT equipment for PCB assembly, and examines automatic pick-and-place machines, the most complex component in a circuit assembly operation. Because of this complexity, the next few columns will address different functions in this process.

Automatic pick-and-place machines are much more common than manual or semiautomatic machines, but they also have the greatest range of capabilities and cost. This column will focus on features and capabilities and include some cautions regarding reliability of low-cost machines, including:

• Production volume ranges (CPH)

• Accuracy and repeatability specs

• Pick-up and centering methods

In future columns, I will address size, machine accuracy, encoders, feeders and mechanical positioning methods.

When starting your evaluation process, there are two defining factors to keep in mind, which determine what category fits your machine needs. The No. 1 principal factor is components per hour (CPH), and the secondary factor is machine capability.

Production Volume

As in the previous column, it’s constructive to start by addressing production ranges for various types of machines, since this is the No. 1 factor in your evaluation process. For purposes of comparison, since all circuit boards vary in size and complexity, we talk about volumes in terms of components per hour, or CPH. The following table offers a general guideline of machine categories defined by their CPH.

Machine Capabilities

This is the second defining factor in helping choose the correct auto pick-and-place machine for your needs. Here, we will only be talking about two aspects of machine capability: accuracy and repeatability, and pick-and-place centering methods.

Accuracy and Repeatability

For production machines, we typically recommend looking for a machine with accuracy of +/- .0001” and down to fine pitch capability of 12 mil on a repeated basis. Less expensive machines often don’t meet this spec. Most low-cost machines will also not come standard with a computer or software which could help with the repeatability aspects if not the accuracy. While some may offer enhanced technology, most do not.

Pick-and-place Centering Methods

There are four methods for pick-up and placement:

1. No centering mechanism

2. Mechanical (jaws)

3. Laser centering

4. Vision centering

Method 1: No centering mechanism other than relying on the component’s pick-up point for placement. In other words, the part is not physically centered after being picked up by the tool head, and if it’s picked off-center on the tool, it will be off-center when placed on the board. Obviously, this is not a very accurate placement method because there is no definable tolerance. You can expect to find this method used by hobbyists or instructors, but certainly not in any type of precision production environment. There are not many options available either, and long-term reliability is questionable.

• Pros: Low cost

• Cons: Low accuracy, repeatability and long-term reliability, no options, or spare parts

• Size range: No definable tolerances

Read The Full Article Here

Editor's Note: This article originally appeared in the March issue of SMT Magazine.

Share

Print


Suggested Items

Business Practices Drive the Smart Factory, Not the Other Way Around (Pt. 2)

04/09/2020 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
In Part 2 of this conversation, Sagi Reuven— business development manager at Mentor, a Siemens Business—continues his discussion on how smart factory implementations must start with traditional process analysis and improvement before the data capture process is useful.

Upgrading to a Digital Line

01/15/2020 | Nolan Johnson, I-Connect007
Ridhi Kantelal of Arch Systems breaks down what fabricators considering bringing in digitalization and upgrading their lines should know, and why they may see the most benefit from focusing on the data engineering aspect rather than the actual retrofitting of their systems.

Is Captive Making a Comeback?

12/20/2019 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 Magazine
Andy Shaughnessy recently spoke with Altium’s Steve Chalgren, senior VP of business strategy and planning. Steve shared his thoughts about why improved manufacturing and automated EMS equipment, such as robotics, might lead smaller OEMs to become captive shops like the old days. Is captive making a comeback?



Copyright © 2020 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.