Selecting an Automatic Pick-and-Place Machine, Pt. 3


Reading time ( words)

In this month’s installment in this series of columns aimed at helping buyers analyze and select SMT equipment for printed circuit board assembly, I will address features that affect decisions on the selection and purchase of an appropriate automatic pick-and-place machine.

As with any complex machine, there will be tradeoffs between cost and capabilities, some of which specifically relate to production accuracy and yield. We will address:

1. Mechanical positioning methods

2. Machine construction

3. Solder paste fluid dispensing

4. Component feeders

To review, when starting the evaluation process, there are two defining factors to keep in mind which determine what category fits your machine needs. The first principal factor is CPH (components per hour), and the secondary factor is machine capability. While it’s constructive to start by understanding how production rates affect the type and performance of a pick-and-place machine, please refer to the prior two installments, in the February and March issues, for those ranges.

Machine capability is the second defining factor in helping choose the correct auto pick-and- place machine for your needs. In this installment, we will address three aspects of machine capability that have a direct impact on final board quality and production yield.

Accuracy and Repeatability

For production machines, we typically recommend looking for a machine with accuracy of +/- .001” and fine pitch capability, down to 12 mils, on a repeated basis. Be aware that less expensive machines rarely meet this spec.

There are several types of positioning systems employed, differences in construction methods, and a variety of component feeders, all of which have an impact on quality and yield.

Component Positioning Systems

After each component is picked up and centered in the tool by one of the methods described in Part 2, it must then be positioned accurately on the board, in an X-Y position. Following are three methods commonly used for positioning, along with pros and cons for each.

1. Positioning with no feedback system (open loop system)

2. Positioning with rotary encoders (closed loop system)

3. Positioning with linear encoders (closed loop system)

Read The Full Article Here

Editor's Note: This article originally appeared in the May issue of SMT Magazine.

Share




Suggested Items

Passing the Test With SMTA’s Rob Boguski

09/14/2022 | Andy Shaughnessy, I-Connect007
I recently spoke with Rob Boguski, president of Fremont, California-based Datest and an SMTA vice president and board member. Rob explained why today’s test customers are asking for more information than the traditional pass/fail, offers a preview of SMTA International, and gives an update on SMTA’s planning strategy for the next five years.

Four Silver Linings in the Stormy Clouds of Pandemic, Supply Chain, and Inflation

09/14/2022 | Dr. Ronald C. Lasky, Indium Corp.
It may be difficult to see any bright spots in the current and recent economic situation. We have all experienced the devastation of the pandemic, supply chain issues, and most recently, inflation. However, as a senior technologist for an international materials supplier (Indium Corporation) and a professor of engineering at an Ivy League research university (Dartmouth College), I offer these four silver linings for those of us in the electronics industry.

Solder Paste Printing and Optimizations for Interconnecting Back Contact Cells

07/26/2022 | Narahari S Pujari and Krithika PM, MacDermid Alpha Electronics Solutions
The interdigitated back contact (IBC) is one of the methods to achieve rear contact solar cell interconnection. The contact and interconnection via rear side theoretically achieve higher efficiency by moving all the front contact grids to the rear side of the device. This results in all interconnection structures being located behind the cells, which brings two main advantages. First, there is no frontside shading of the cell by the interconnection ribbons, thus eliminating the need for trading off series resistance, losses for shading losses when using larger interconnection ribbons. Second, a more homogeneous looking frontside of the solar module enhances the aesthetics.



Copyright © 2022 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.