Lost in the System: How Traceability can Solve the Problem of Counterfeit Materials


Reading time ( words)

The word "counterfeit" encompasses a wide range of activities that are happening continuously in an "underground” SMT supply chain. The risks and potential effects resulting from the use of counterfeit materials can be huge, threatening human life, as well as the success of any company in the electronics industry. Word on the street is that the occurrence of counterfeit materials is growing rapidly, which means, at some point, a critical mass will be reached. The best managers and engineers among us must surely realize that now is the time to get proactive on this issue before a serious compelling event occurs. Let's play detective and investigate this dark side of manufacturing to try and find out what exactly can be done.

The classic plot of any detective story is the task of discovering the motive, means, and opportunity for the crime. In business, the motive is focused on the financial aspects of materials supply. After all, materials generally are 80–90% of the cost of a finished product. As manufacturing costs decrease, the material costs become more significant. For example, shaving a cent or two off the cost of material in each product can be significant when scaled up to the level of materials used in high-volume consumer products. At the other end of the scale, many individual materials have a high enough value to be a target for counterfeiting even when used in lower volumes.

As well as the physical properties of the materials, test and qualification processes add value to a material, differentiating it from otherwise identical materials. In critical applications, materials that have not been through prescribed testing or have not been handled in an approved way are disqualified from use.

Motivation

As a result of these pressures, the motivation to reduce material costs can encompass:

Vendor cloning: There are many choices of materials manufacturers, and some have better quality or consistent products, which are also more expensive. The golden rule is to select the level of quality needed at the lowest price available. Substituting lower cost materials in volume, however, can make a considerable financial difference.

Test failures: In testing materials during manufacture, some will inevitably fail. Electrical properties may fall outside of control parameters, or stress testing may reveal weaknesses. These failures create an opportunity for individual materials, groups of materials, or even a whole batch of materials to be scrapped or re-packaged as cheaper versions. This may not represent a huge cost to the original manufacturer, but the opportunity to make some extra money could be a significant motivation to anyone else involved in disposal or recycling.

Trial materials: Materials made during the setting up of manufacturing processes, or samples generated, could also be intercepted in the disposal process and re-sold.

Dirty materials: It is not only in the material manufacture and supply-chain process that counterfeit materials can be introduced. Spoilage generated during assembly production can also be inappropriately used. For example, materials that have been rejected by the SMT processes and discarded may be gathered up and recycled back into the machine at a later time. The handling of these materials outside of the supply-chain rules introduces risk of contamination from dirt and water. In many situations, refurbishing materials is acceptable, but in a situation where an acute shortage of materials happens at the end of a production run because of unexpectedly high spoilage can be a great motivator to simply pick up discarded materials and put them in a tray for re-use. These are also counterfeit because they deviate from the approved supply procedure.

“Garage” materials: Some materials are made specifically with the intent to replace authorized materials. The classic situation is an entrepreneur who buys an out-dated manufacturing process that he sets up in a garage to churn out materials made with substandard raw materials, often without testing. The intent is simply to make the materials as cheaply as possible and then find a way to introduce them as genuine materials in the supply chain.

Read The Full Article Here

Editor's Note: This article originally appeared in the January 2016 issue of SMT Magazine.

Share




Suggested Items

Axiom Inspired by Industry Challenges

09/20/2022 | Michael Schindele, Axiom
After living through more than two years of the pandemic, we are very aware of the issues facing the electronics industry. We have witnessed months of factory shutdowns, labor disruptions due to a reduced workforce, and country, regional, and citywide COVID regulations and shutdowns. I will describe some of the issues we’ve been facing, and then explain how we learned to be creative and look for the silver linings in these disruptions.

Supply Chain’s Risky Behavior

02/02/2022 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
Barry Matties and Nolan Johnson speak with Joe O’Neil, CEO of Green Circuits, about something that seems to be on everyone’s minds—the rising cost of, well, everything. Joe’s background in marketing and finance, as well as his leadership at Green Circuits, positions him as an expert on managing costs related to labor, facilities, lead times, employee training, and the future of the industry. But what rising costs actually surprised him? This is a must-read for us all.

‘Trust Me, I Have Your Chips Right Here’

01/17/2022 | Michael Ford, Aegis Software Corp.
When making the decision to purchase materials, there is a strong benefit from a trust in the supplier. When materials are in short supply, however, there is no time to establish trust with a new supplier, especially when it’s the only one that can fulfill a requirement. While the manufacturing world is seeking methods to find trust with previously unknown suppliers, there are also those who are getting cleverer at disguising their often-nefarious activities—ones that could bring catastrophic results. In the real world, how can supply chain trust be established and maintained, or is it safer to assume that everyone is out to get us?



Copyright © 2022 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.