-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- smt007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueComing to Terms With AI
In this issue, we examine the profound effect artificial intelligence and machine learning are having on manufacturing and business processes. We follow technology, innovation, and money as automation becomes the new key indicator of growth in our industry.
Box Build
One trend is to add box build and final assembly to your product offering. In this issue, we explore the opportunities and risks of adding system assembly to your service portfolio.
IPC APEX EXPO 2024 Pre-show
This month’s issue devotes its pages to a comprehensive preview of the IPC APEX EXPO 2024 event. Whether your role is technical or business, if you're new-to-the-industry or seasoned veteran, you'll find value throughout this program.
- Articles
Article Highlights
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Events
||| MENU - smt007 Magazine
Evaluating the Impact of Powder Size and Stencils on Solder Paste Transfer Efficiency
July 31, 2018 | T. O’Neill, C. Tafoya, and G. Ramirez, AIM Metals and AlloysEstimated reading time: 9 minutes
The solder paste tested included Types 4 and 5 in a modern, no-clean flux medium. The pastes were blended, shipped and stored under recommended conditions. The same metal percentage was used for the T4 (88.5%) and T5 (88.3%) as in earlier tests; however, different lots of solder powder and flux medium were used in this test.
Experimental Design
Input variables in the experiment included:
• Paste Type (4, 5)
• Stencil nanocoating (Y/N)
• Foil mounting tension (std/high)
• Pause time between print tests (0, 30, 60 and 90 minutes)
• PCB pad size (6–15mil)
• PCB pad shape (circular, square, modified square with rounded corners)
• PCB pad definition (NSMD, SMD)
Output variables included:
• Deposit volume
• Deposit height
• Transfer efficiency (% volume). TE is based on theoretical aperture sizes, not measured aperture sizes. All the stencils were cut from the same material on the same cutter by the same operator, so it is assumed that any systemic error is applied equally to all stencils. Actual aperture sizes were not measured
Statistics calculated from the output readings included:
• Means (or averages)
• Standard deviations
• Coefficients of variation (CV, or the standard deviation divided by the mean and expressed as a percentage). CV is preferred over Cpk when comparing different SPI datasets because it normalizes the variation with respect to the mean without the influence of control limits
• Using generally accepted industry practices, the acceptability criterion was TE at least 80% of theoretical aperture volume and a CV of less than 10%
Stencil under wipes were performed before each set of five prints, but not between prints. SPI readings were taken immediately after each print. The full runs that included 0, 30-, 60- and 90-minute pauses took approximately four hours from start to finish.
The tests were nested as follows:
Time 0
1. Install stencil and squeegees
2. Stir solder paste and apply to stencil
3. Print 5 boards
4. Start timer for 30 minutes
5. Remove stencil and squeegees, leave paste on stencil
At 30-minute mark on timer run WVD wipe
1. Print 5 boards
2. Start timer for 60 minutes
3. Remove stencil and squeegees, install stencil and squeegees
4. At 30-minute mark on timer, run WVD
5. Print 5 boards
At 60-minute mark run WVD wipe
1. Print 5 boards
2. Start timer for 90 minutes
3. Remove stencil and squeegees, install “A” stencil and squeegees
4. At 60-minute mark on timer run WVD wipe
5. Print 5 boards
At 90-minute mark on timer "F" run WVD wipe
1. Print 5 boards
2. Start timer for 120 minutes
3. Remove stencil and squeegees, install stencil and squeegees
4. At 90-minute mark on timer, run WVD wipe
5. Print 5 boards
6. Remove stencil and squeegees
Table 2: Data management spreadsheet.
Table 2 shows the data management worksheet that indicates variable, run order, board labeling and SPI file tracking information.
Results and Discussion
There is myriad facets to consider when analyzing the collected data. To streamline the analysis:
1. data has been compartmentalized by component type or padstack
2. only best- and worst-case scenarios are reviewed
3. paste transfer quality is interpreted with respect to the main input variables of nanocoating, paste particle size, and foil tensioning
BGAs
0.4 and 0.5 mm BGA apertures are the first features considered, as these devices are becoming common to the industry and are a frequent print challenge for mainstream PBC assemblers. The test vehicle’s area ratios are 0.71 for 0.5 mm BGA and 0.62 for 0.4 mm BGA. These are at either side of the threshold of recommended guidelines of 0.66 AR, which has historically been cited as the lowest AR that should be considered when printing T3 solder paste. T3 was not included in this test because T4 is quickly becoming the industry standard it is usually readily available. T5 was also tested, as it is often requested by assemblers who perceive smaller powder size as a fast and easy improvement to a fine pitch printing process. T5 paste indeed brings some print advantages, but also carries with it some inherent disadvantages. Procuring T5 paste can present supply chain challenges and it can increase variability in paste print and reflow performance over time due to the higher surface area: volume ratio.
Figures 3 and 4 shows the Transfer Efficiency (TE), or the percentage of theoretical aperture volume that was deposited and the associated Coefficients of Variation (CVs) for the 0.5 mm and 0.4 mm BGAs. Each data point on the 0.5 mm chart represents the average of 3780 deposit readings—84 I/Os per device, 3 devices per board, three boards per panel and five panels per test. Each data point on the 0.4 mm BGA chart represents 16,200 measurements, as the same number of devices have 360 I/Os each. This quantity of data generates high confidence in the results.
Page 2 of 3
Suggested Items
Connect the Dots: Designing for Reality—The Pre-Manufacturing Process
05/08/2024 | Matt Stevenson -- Column: Connect the DotsI have been working with Nolan Johnson on a podcast series about designing PCBs for the reality of manufacturing. By sharing lessons learned over a long career in the PCB industry, we hope to shorten learning curves and help designers produce better boards with less hassle and rework. Episode 2 deals with the electronic pre-manufacturing process. Moving from CAD (computer-aided design) to CAM (computer-aided manufacturing) is a key step in PCB manufacturing. CAM turns digital designs into instructions that machines can use to actually build the PCB.
AIM Solder Signs Shinil Fl Ltd. as New Distributor for Korea
05/08/2024 | AIM SolderAIM Solder, a leading global manufacturer of solder assembly materials for the electronics industry, is pleased to announce a new distribution partnership with Shinil Fl Ltd., a prominent supplier of technological solutions in the SMT and semiconductor sectors.
Indium Corporation to Showcase HIA Materials at ECTC
05/07/2024 | Indium CorporationAs an industry leader in innovative materials solutions for semiconductor packaging and assembly, Indium Corporation® will feature its advanced products designed to meet the evolving challenges of heterogeneous integration and assembly (HIA) and fine-pitch system-in-package (SiP) applications at the 74th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), May 28‒31, in Denver, Colorado.
Indium Corporation Expert to Present on Pb-Free Solder for Die-Attach in Discrete Power Applications
04/30/2024 | Indium CorporationIndium Corporation Product Manager – Semiconductor Dean Payne will present at the Advanced Packaging for Power Electronics conference, hosted by IMAPS, held May 8-9 in Woburn, Massachusetts, USA.
Taiyo Circuit Automation Installs New DP3500 into Fuba Printed Circuits, Tunisia
04/25/2024 | Taiyo Circuit AutomationTaiyo Circuit Automation is proud to be partnered with Fuba Printed Circuits, Tunisia part of the OneTech Group of companies, a leading printed circuit board manufacturer based out of Bizerte, Tunisia, on their first installation of Taiyo Circuit Automation DP3500 coater.