Improving SMT Yield and Reducing Defects: A Rauland Case Study


Reading time ( words)

When Crow added NanoClear to his SMT process, he followed Shea’s advice and expected to double under-stencil wipe cleaning every fourth or fifth board to every eighth or ninth or tenth board. With Aculon’s NanoClear, Crow’s throughput was increased by a third and the factory’s defect as tracked by Koh Young Zenith and AOI dropped by 52%. All his projections were blown away.

Aculon_Fig3_Feb2018.jpg

Figure 3: The cost calculator considers the costs of rework, both simple and complex, the cost of wiper paper, and the cost of the solvent.

Crow's line could now run 24 print cycles before cleaning. Their AOI and ATE tests saw no reduction in quality. With a faster screen printer, a faster SMT line and a cleaner process, Crow maintained improved quality while running faster.

The Numbers

Crow thought he had found the trifecta—softer wiper paper, engineered solvents and a nanocoating. As a result, Crow delivered terrific results for Rauland: SMT-related defects were reduced by over 50%; throughput was increased by over 20%, and the company saved $1 million per year for three SMT lines. First pass yield went from 80% to 99%. The line had a 79% reduction in under-stencil wiping as the interval went from five prints per wipe to 24 prints per wipe.

Using the downloadable cost of ownership calculator Shea created for Aculon, Crow could demonstrate to management the result of his process improvement program. In calculating savings, the cost calculator considers the costs of rework, both simple and complex, the cost of wiper paper, and the cost of the solvent. Using the calculator, Crow could determine that the cost per board for simple rework was $2.30 per board compared with $34.50 per board for the cost of complex rework. In addition, the cost of paper was just $0.03 per board and the cost of solvent was $0.02 per board.

By combining the rework savings along with the reduction in paper and solvent used due to less under-stencil wiping, the annual savings demonstrated from using the calculator were considerable. In addition, as Crow’s team was not changing wiper rolls as often, he was getting an extra 52 hours—over a full shift week—of additional production a year. For his investment, Crow produced an additional 5,000 boards a year. With approximately 200 stencils at a cost of $25 an application, a total investment across all stencils is about $5,000—to save $395,000.

Crow's management recognized the magnificent work by giving him a bonus and promotion. So, what can we say, but, 'Well done Jimmy!' Here's to a job well done.

Share

Print


Suggested Items

Catching Up With Nova Engineering

04/27/2021 | Dan Beaulieu, D.B. Management Group
When searching for companies to interview, I always look for something unique and that makes the company special. Truth be told, I am a collector of stories about good, well-run, unique companies that we can learn something from. Nova Engineering is one of those companies.

What Makes a Good Process Engineer?

03/03/2021 | Nolan Johnson, I-Connect007
Nolan Johnson recently spoke with Tuan Tran, director of customer solutions at Green Circuits, about what makes a successful process engineer. They also discuss a typical day in the life of a process engineer—from pre-manufacturing through post-DFM, for process improvement. As Tuan points out, there are a variety of paths to becoming a great process engineer.

Tech 2 Tech: KYZEN’s Short Technical Sessions a Big Hit

01/20/2021 | Nolan Johnson, I-Connect007
Nolan Johnson gets an update from Tom Forsythe on KYZEN’s Tech 2 Tech sessions. These brief 15-minute sessions were set up during the pandemic by KYZEN for customers, prospects, and new engineers around cleaning, and have since found traction with their manufacturers, reps and distributors.



Copyright © 2021 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.