Reading time ( words)

Many design engineers and even many software suppliers make the significant mistake of equating changes in trace or via temperature with current density. This is incorrect at best and dangerous at worst. There is little if any correlation between temperature and current density. Current and trace dimensions (among other things) are the relevant variables, but current density is not. I hope by the end of this article you will see why. Here are four illustrations that will help you understand this.

1. **Current Density Is Not an Independent Measure**

We can understand that the change in trace (and via) temperatures are a function of other variables. Thus, we can formulate the following as two possible relationships (all other things equal). Let:

C = current

J = current density

w = trace width

th = trace thickness

ΔT = change in trace temperature

Then, we can suggest the following:

Equation 1: ΔT = fn(C, w, th)

Equation 2: ΔT = fn(J, w, th)

Now, the question is, “Are both of these relationships true, or, if not, is either one true?” We know from the extensive experimental evaluations reported in IPC-2152 that Equation 1 is true, so is Equation 2 also true? From Equations 1 and 2, it follows that:

Equation 1a: C = fn(ΔT, w, th)

Equation 2a: J = fn(ΔT, w, th)

*To read this entire article, which appeared in the September 2020 issue of Design007 Magazine, click here.*

####
Share

Print

## Suggested Items

04/30/2021 |
Ed Acheson, Cadence Design Systems

With the current design transfer formats, rigid-flex designers face a hand-off conundrum. You know the situation: My rigid-flex design is done so now it is time to get this built and into the product. Reviewing the documentation reveals that there are tables to define the different stackup definitions used in the design. The cross-references for the different zones to areas of the design are all there, I think. The last time a zone definition was missed, we caused a costly mistake.

04/29/2021 |
Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 Magazine

Andy Shaughnessy recently spoke with PCEA’s Scott McCurdy and Tomas Chester about the organization’s plans for its second year. They explained that they plan to add new chapters and members, especially younger engineers like Tomas.

04/19/2021 |
I-Connect007 Editorial Team

Nolan Johnson and Happy Holden speak with Sarah Czaplewski, whose team at IBM won the Best Technical Paper award at this year’s IPC APEX for “Signal Integrity, Reliability, and Cost Evaluation of PCB Interlayer Crosstalk Reduction.”