-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- smt007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueBox Build
One trend is to add box build and final assembly to your product offering. In this issue, we explore the opportunities and risks of adding system assembly to your service portfolio.
IPC APEX EXPO 2024 Pre-show
This month’s issue devotes its pages to a comprehensive preview of the IPC APEX EXPO 2024 event. Whether your role is technical or business, if you're new-to-the-industry or seasoned veteran, you'll find value throughout this program.
Boost Your Sales
Every part of your business can be evaluated as a process, including your sales funnel. Optimizing your selling process requires a coordinated effort between marketing and sales. In this issue, industry experts in marketing and sales offer their best advice on how to boost your sales efforts.
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Events
||| MENU - smt007 Magazine
IPC Solder Products Value Council Issues Report on Take Action Limits for SAC Lead-free Solder Processes
January 6, 2010 |Estimated reading time: 2 minutes
BANNOCKBURN, IL — Following a two-year study on the effect of impurity limits on the performance of lead-free solder, the IPC Solder Products Value Council (SPVC) has announced the publication of a white paper, “Take Action Limits (TAL) for SAC305 Lead-Free Soldering Processes Utilizing Solder Baths/Pots.” The paper provides electronics manufacturers with better-defined limits to guide them on a more efficient use of solder, aiming to improve yields.
Take action limits, also known as “dump pot specifications,” are important to any electronics manufacturing company using flow soldering techniques either in selective soldering or wave soldering. The report is based on testing of 8 common SAC alloys that were subjected to strenuous tests, including wetting and electron microscope examination. The IPC TAL white paper identifies three action levels:
- Normal operation -- the level one would expect contamination levels to be, based on running at a steady state.
- Increased monitoring -- a level that is not a danger but indicates an upward trend that should be monitored more closely.
- Adjust pot -- the level at which the pot should be adjusted to ensure reliable performance of solder joints.
Paul Lotosky, global director of customer technical support at Cookson Electronics, and chairman of the IPC SPVC technical subcommittee, explained that current specifications for contamination are for either tin/lead alloys or for component and board acceptance. “Take Action Limits (TAL) for SAC305 Lead-Free Soldering Processes Utilizing Solder Baths/Pots reports on a series of tests to validate take action limits of solder pot contamination for SAC305 lead-free solder.”
The report also sets TALs for 14 materials that can commonly be introduced during normal board production, such as gold, nickel and bismuth. In addition, scatter plot diagrams for all wetting test results as well as statistical analyses of wetting data are included.
“The report is another example of how the industry can work together to create a coherent set of technical requirements increases efficiencies and eliminates unnecessary waste,” added Karl Seelig, AIM Inc. and chairman of the IPC SPVC. The project first began in August 2007.
IPC members can download the IPC TAL white paper for free at www.ipc.org/SPVC-TAL-download. Nonmembers may purchase the report for $25 at www.ipc.org/SPVC-TAL-purchase. For more information on the white paper or the SPVC, contact Anthony Hilvers, IPC vice president of industry programs, at (847) 597-2837 or TonyHilvers@ipc.org. In support of IPC’s Mission Statement, the IPC Solder Products Value Council recognizes that the PCB manufacturing and electronics assembly industries must grow profitably. The Council’s objective is to identify and execute programs designed to enhance the competitive position of solder manufacturers and their customers.
Hilvers, Seelig, and Lotosky, along with Greg Munie, John Vivari, and George Wenger, published the results of a three-year SPVC study on lead-free reliability with SMT in 2006: To Void or Not to Void?